Then, read Dan Edelen's Throwing Stones in Glass Houses of Worship.
Then you tell me:
- Do you think Dan actually read Phil's post all the way through (as he insists that his readers do, with his post)?
- Are you persuaded by Dan's plea that he "didn’t want to write this post," but that it "need[ed] to be written" because of the contents of Phil's post?
- Do you think the bad experiences Dan claims to have had with Reformed guys is at all analogous to Phil's post?